Home Page >
Timothy R. Hughes' Articles >
AIA Nova News
Timothy R. Hughes, Esq.
Hughes & Associates, P.L.L.C.
ADR stands for “alternative dispute resolution.”
The two basic forms of ADR are arbitration and mediation. These dispute
resolution mechanisms were created as an alternative to traditional
litigation in court. Understanding the advantages and disadvantages of
ADR are important to all people in the Construction industry in general
and design professionals in particular.
Mediation
Mediation involves an attempt by the parties to
discuss resolution of a dispute outside of court. Mediation is entirely
voluntary in that unless the parties mutually agree to resolve the
dispute, no resolution happens. Mediation generally involves retention of
an independent third party to act as mediator.
In almost all cases, I strongly support using
mediation to settle cases. I particularly support attempting mediation as
early as possible in a case to avoid potentially unnecessary legal fees
and expenses. I would note that, in the words of one very well respected
mediator, “A good mediation results in a settlement that nobody likes.”
This is a good fact to understand prior to coming to the mediation table.
Arbitration
Arbitration involves trying a case before an
arbitrator. Arbitration is similar to a court case in that the case is
actually tried and the arbitrator issues a finding that is legally binding
upon the parties. In concept, arbitration is geared to streamlining the
discovery process and trial process to save time, legal expenses and
costs.
Arbitration comes with its drawbacks. The
streamlined discovery process can make arbitration riskier. It may be
more difficult to see all the cards in the opponent’s hand prior to trying
the case. Arbitration tends to result in almost anything coming in as
evidence. Evidence that would clearly be excluded in court routinely is
admitted in arbitration. This may be a plus or a minus depending on the
evidence in your specific case.
Arbitrator tends to ignore legal defenses such a
statute of limitations or statute of repose. Given Virginia law as to
design professionals, this can be a significant drawback for design
professionals. Arbitration permits virtually no appellate review. Again,
as with evidence in arbitration, this can be a good thing or a bad thing
depending on the result. Finally, arbitrators are often known for
“splitting the baby” and issuing an arbitrary result rather than making a
tough call.
Conclusion
The expensive and time consuming nature of
litigation may make DAR an attractive option for resolution of a dispute.
Mediation is generally a very attractive option. Arbitration comes with
both benefits and draw backs. It makes sense to carefully consider your
options rather than blindly signing an agreement in contains ADR
provision.

Timothy R. Hughes, Esq., is the principal of the Northern
Virginia law firm of Hughes & Associates, P.L.L.C. He specializes in
construction litigation, corporate and business related representation,
and complex civil litigation. He may be reached at
tim@hughesnassociates.com.
Printed with permission
from AIA NOVA News January/February
2005
Top of page
Timothy R. Hughes'
Articles | Home Page |
Contact Us