Home Page >
Timothy R. Hughes' Articles >
AIA Nova News
Timothy R. Hughes, Esq.
Hughes & Associates, P.L.L.C.
Many architects I know are very surprised to
realize that the question of licensing extends not just to the individual
architect, but also to corporations. Most firms or corporations are the
contracting party. Further, the last thing any professional wants is for
regulatory authorities to investigate their firm on a licensing
violation.
Locally, the District of Columbia indicates that
“no person” shall practice architecture without a license. D.C. Code §
47-2853.02. Naturally, the legislators then define “person” to include
firms, companies, and corporations. D.C. Code § 47-2807. Maryland law
requires that corporations practicing architecture have a license. Md.
Code Ann., Businesses, Occupations and Professions Article, § 3-403.
Finally, Virginia law requires a corporation rendering professional
architectural services to hold a license. Code of Virginia, §
54.1-406(B).
You should not assume that the apparent local
consistency implies the same rules apply everywhere. Indeed, some states
have express limitations on the ability to practice architecture in
various business formations. You need to know the statutes and
regulations in every place where you practice or even solicit business.
Similarly, you need to intimately know what the
“practice of architecture” means in each jurisdiction. For example, is it
acceptable to advertise for work prior to obtaining your license? Is it
acceptable to negotiate a contract where the client knows you will be
obtaining your reciprocal license in advance of the project?
There is divergence amongst the various states
on these issues. Some states, including the District of Columbia,
expressly provide that merely offering to render architectural services
constitutes the practice of architecture and thus requires a license. In
contrast, Delaware permits architects to offer services prior to
registration so long as they are licensed per NCARB in another
jurisdiction and if they obtain a license prior to actually performing
work. Delaware Code, Article 24 § 303.
The ramifications of failing to properly obtain
and hold a license can be crippling. Some states permit a client to
retain services without payment when a party performs services without a
license. On problem projects, the last thing you want to do is give your
opponent in litigation a fantastic cross-examination point that you were
never even properly licensed. All architects need to know and understand
the rules on licensing in every state in which that practice or plan on
soliciting business.

Timothy R. Hughes, Esq., is the principal of the Northern
Virginia law firm of Hughes & Associates, P.L.L.C. He specializes in
construction litigation, corporate and business related representation,
and complex civil litigation. He may be reached at
tim@hughesnassociates.com.
Printed with permission
from AIA NOVA News May/June 2004
Top of page
Timothy R. Hughes' Articles | Home Page |
Contact Us