Home Page >
Timothy R. Hughes' Articles >
Electrical Contractor Magazine
Timothy R. Hughes, Esq.
Hughes & Associates, P.L.L.C.
Federal and state public projects generally require the contractor to
obtain bonds. Claims against those bonds form a significant part of
litigation on public projects. Understanding the basics of bonds and bond
claims is important, particularly for subcontractors on the job. You
should know exactly how far the bond protection extends, and what
requirements are placed on you to exercise bond rights, before performing
work on the job.
The “Miller Act” and “Little Miller Acts”
The Miller Act is a piece of federal legislation which requires
contractors on federal public projects over $100,000 to secure performance
and payment bonds for the project. The performance bond is secured to
ensure completion of the federal project. The payment bond is secured “for
the protection of all persons supplying labor and material in carrying out
the work provided for in the contract for the use of each person.” 40
U.S.C.A. § 3131 (b)(2).
Theoretically, if the general contractor defaults, the owner can look to
the surety company who issued the performance bond to finish the job. The
surety may have various defenses that permit it to avoid finishing the
project. In contrast, payment bonds are secured to ensure that
subcontractors and suppliers on a job are paid. As an electrical
subcontractor, you are more likely to be concerned with payment bonds than
performance bonds.
Various states have enacted parallel legislation to cover public projects
undertaken by individual states. Each state statute is generally called
the “Little Miller Act” for that specific state. While the details vary
from state to state, most states generally parallel the Miller Act
language in requiring both performance and payment bonds for their public
projects.
Who Is Protected by the Miller Act?
Case law interpreting the Miller Act provides that the payment bond
protection applies to “first tier” subcontractors. Subcontractors and
suppliers who contract directly with the prime contractor are entitled to
protection. Case law further provides that certain second tier parties who
supply labor or material directly to a subcontractor performing work are
also protected. Second tier parties who contract with a materialman rather
than a subcontractor are not protected. Third tier subcontractors or
suppliers receive no protection whatsoever. The question of whether a
party is a subcontractor or a materialman has naturally been hotly
litigated and debated in many cases.
With regards to the various Little Miller Acts, you should be familiar
with the extent of payment bond protection in your specific state. The
same question of exactly how far the payment bond protection extends is
also an issue on state projects. You should be aware of whether you are
protected by the payment bond before you bid on the project.
Notice and Limitations Periods
Under the Miller Act, first tier subcontractors and suppliers are not
required to provide notice of a claim to the prime contractor. Second tier
claimants must give written notice of the claim within 90 days after the
last labor or materials were furnished. 40 U.S.C.A. § 3133 (b). The notice
must contain both the amount claimed and the name of the party to whom the
material or labor was provided. 40 U.S.C.A. § 3133 (a). When in doubt,
send the notice even if you believe it may not be required.
With regards to the statute of limitations, the Miller Act provides that a
payment bond claimant cannot file suit until 90 days have passed after the
last material or labor was provided to the project. The suit must be filed
within one year of the last labor or material being provided to the
project. 40 U.S.C.A. § 3133 (b).
Under the various Little Miller Acts, you can again expect to have state
specific notice and limitations provisions. You may also have contractual
notice and limitations periods contained in the individual bonds that were
issued on the project. Some states may look to the bond if it has a
shorter period, while other states would provide that the state statute
provides a minimum amount of time for notice and for the claimant to file
suit. You should be familiar with the rules that apply in your state to
your bonds.
Conclusion
Bonds on public projects may offer a relatively quick and easy way for a
subcontractor to obtain payment on a project. It is critical to know and
understand the terms of the applicable bonds on your project and whether
the bond coverage extends to you and your work on the job before you bid.
Knowledge of these terms can permit you to assess your risk before the bid
and can also dictate how aggressively you need to research the financial
acumen and resources of the parties on the project before you get
involved.

Timothy R. Hughes, Esq., is the principal of the Northern
Virginia law firm of Hughes & Associates, P.L.L.C. He specializes in
construction litigation, corporate and business related representation,
and complex civil litigation. He may be reached at
tim@hughesnassociates.com.
Printed with permission
from
Electrical Contractor
Top of page
Timothy R. Hughes' Articles | Home Page |
Contact Us