Home Page >
Timothy R. Hughes' Articles >
Masonry
Magazine
Timothy R. Hughes, Esq.
Hughes & Associates, P.L.L.C.
Construction sites are extremely dangerous
places. Construction work presents the possibility of catastrophic
injuries or even death to workers and bystanders. In addition to the moral
need to protect the life, health and safety of workers and bystanders,
mason contractors need to understand the potential financial impact of
work related injuries. Injured workers and bystanders cause lost
production, liability claims, lawsuits and increases in insurance premiums
or even difficulties in obtaining insurance. Finally, injuries can trigger
OSHA investigations and possible regulatory penalties.
In order to attack the problem of safety for masons on
construction sites, we first examine OSHA publications that categorize and
analyze sources of construction injuries. Next, we review the most common
OSHA violations for areas of particular focus. Finally, we offer some
suggestions for developing a culture of safety within a construction
company.
Understanding the Issues
In
November 1990, OSHA released its Analysis of Construction Fatalities —
The OSHA Data Base 1985-1989. While the analysis was originally
conducted to evaluate the impact of demographic factors on the prevalence
of injuries, the publication includes some interesting facts regarding
site injuries.
For the period of 1985-1989, 33% of all construction
fatalities were the result of falls. What may be surprising is that 8% of
the fall fatalities occurred in the masonry/stonework/tile
setting/plastering trade classification.
In the same publication, OSHA provided a breakdown of
the relative heights of the fatal falls. Roughly 25% of fatal falls
occurred from 21 to 30 feet. Another 24% occurred from 11 to 20 feet.
Finally, an additional 8% occurred from six to 10 feet. Thus, a full 57%
of fatal falls occurred at 30 feet or less. Therefore, masons need to be
cognizant of their surroundings and safety considerations, and take safety
seriously at all times.
Avoiding Common Violations
OSHA
analyzed the most prevalent violations found in investigations during 1991
and compared them with preceding years in The 100 Most Frequently Cited
OSHA Construction Standards in 1991: A Guide for the Abatement of the Top
25 Associated Physical Hazards (reprinted March 1995). While an
exhaustive analysis of each violation and associated regulation is
impossible here, a look at some of the most prevalent violations can act
as a starting point for mason contractors concerned with injuries,
liability and potential OSHA violations.
Program Violations
The
top six most common violations relate to so-called "program" violations
rather than physical conditions. These include the failure to properly
develop, maintain and post hazardous material information, the failure to
conduct proper hazardous material training, and the failure to post OSHA
compliant posters and the like. The sixth most prevalent violation was a
failure of employers to instruct each employee in the recognition and
avoidance of unsafe conditions as required in 29 C.F.R. 1926.21(b)(2).
Interestingly, the top six program violations totaled 26.2% of all total
OSHA violations in 1991.
These program violations are clearly avoidable through
establishing an effective safety program, conducting regular safety
inspections, and adequately training all employees. As such, work site
safety needs to start from the top of the company down, and must become an
integral part of a company's culture.
Physical Violations
As
with the prevalence of program violations, the physical condition
violations found by OSHA offer clear guidance to mason contractors for
points of emphasis. The most common physical violation was a failure to
guard open-sided floors and platforms in violation of 29 C.F.R. 500
(d)(1). You can avoid violating this standard by simply affixing proper
guardrails in any open-sided floor or platform more than six feet above
ground level.
The second most common physical violation was
inadequate head protection. Workers in areas of possible head injury from
impact with falling or flying objects are required to wear appropriate
compliant headgear. Injuries resulting from lack of headgear are clearly
avoidable.
A full 15% of all OSHA physical violations related to
scaffolding violations. The most common failure was a lack of compliance
with guardrail specifications for tubular welded frame scaffolds.
Guardrails and toe boards are required at all open-sides and -ends of
scaffolds more than ten feet above the ground or floor. Even where
guardrails were installed on the sides, they were often missing on the
ends of the scaffolding triggering a violation. Use of cross braces (X
braces) does not equate to the presence of a guardrail. The prevalence of
violations, coupled with the threat of falls and the ubiquitous use of
scaffolds in masonry operations point to scaffolding as a critical area of
focus.
Additional scaffolding violations are legion and
include failure to install proper safety nets, improper bracing, lack of
safe access for scaffolds, and lack of compliance with scaffold guarding
specifications.
Simple Suggestions for Safety Improvement
The
OSHA web site, located at
www.osha.gov, is a fantastic source of information and contains
numerous publications.
Next, develop and implement a compliant safety
program. Special attention needs to be paid on an on-going basis to
training each employee on safety concerns in a general manner, and also to
provide training specific to the safety concerns of each individual job.
Each job site needs a responsible person charged with maintaining site
safety. Finally, beyond the generalized attention to program requirements
for safety, your company needs to have someone responsible who knows the
applicable regulations and requirements.
While all this effort may seem excessive, you should
keep in mind the critical interests involved. In developing these programs
and complying with OSHA regulations, you are protecting the lives of your
employees, other workers on the site and any passersby. Installation of
that toe board on the scaffolding may take a little time, but you may
protect an innocent bystander from being pelted by a dropped tool from a
scaffold — as well as you from a cut-and-dry lawsuit. Also, you will be
taking serious strides to reducing OSHA penalties for your company. Thus,
these efforts are certainly time well spent.

Timothy R. Hughes, Esq., is the principal of the Northern
Virginia law firm of Hughes & Associates, P.L.L.C. He specializes in
construction litigation, corporate and business related representation,
and complex civil litigation. He may be reached at
tim@hughesnassociates.com.
http://www.masonrymagazine.com/2-04/legal.html
Printed with permission
from Masonry Magazine
Top of page
Timothy R. Hughes' Articles | Home Page |
Contact Us